Saturday, May 12, 2012

PTSD = BS

When I was selling life insurance full time I did quite a lot of business with soldiers stationed at Ft. Stewart in Hinesville, Georgia.  I was pretty good at getting these guys covered prior to their deployment to Iraq but a stumbling block I could never find a way around was getting troops leaving the service or retiring covered for disability insurance and sometimes, even life insurance.

Most of these guys were still in their early 40's and non-smokers in excellent health.  But the catch was, according to the Army, they were "disabled."  It turned out that most any kind of scratch or injury in a combat zone qualified you for 10% disability which not only increased your retirement pay, but also made you eligible for 100% Veterans Administration health benefits for you and your dependents for the rest of your life. It was a scam that everyone turned a blind eye to so that retiring veterans could pad their wallets.

I believe the same thing is happening now with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.  I read somewhere where 80% of the troops stationed in Iraq and Afghanistan never see combat and are never under enemy fire.  I have also read estimates that as many as 60% of the troops stationed in the Middle East suffer PTSD.
  
I say, poppycock.

Last weekend, Sunday, May 6th was the 70th Anniversary of the fall of Bataan and the 1942 surrender at Corregidor, Philippines.  The local chapter of the Filipino American Veterans Society held a commemorative service at the Veterans Wall and I decided to attend, just because.

There were three of the original WWII veterans there and they told their personal stories of the Bataan Death March.  Each story was blood curdling, filled with unbelievable atrocities committed by the Japanese Army.  One man remembered how they were forced-marched for 120 miles without food or water.  He said the American soldiers were abused most, those that fell behind shot on the spot and left to rot on the side of the road as reminders to those that followed.  Out of 60 men in his group, only 6 survived the march.

None of these Filipinos received any veterans benefits what-so-ever or even an official thank you until corrective legislation was passed in May, 2009, 67 years after the fact. You know what? None of them complained about it. None of them expected anything special. Each of them stood tall at the ceremony and sang God Bless America and saluted the flag.


We have become a nation of entitlement wimps.  A Navy medical officer told me recently that in spite of the economy, the military is having a hard time filling its ranks because only one out of four who apply are accepted.  Why?  Obesity and character flaws, re: criminal records.  Obviously, a large proportion of the one quarter that do make it believe they are entitled to special treatment simply for "being there."
 
There is no doubt that many soldiers in combat suffer legitimate traumatic stress and deserve all of the help they can get.  But most of them, PTSD my ass.

And yes, I am a veteran.

10 comments:

  1. I agree with you. Veterans I know also all agree with you. I think it is as you said in that it is hard to find people to enlist and also those who don't enlist may feel guilty and so support the supposed disabled. Yes, there are some who deserve every bit of recognition they can get, but overall....

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mr. C don't get me wrong because I completely understand your point to a certain extent but this is a vastly different nation now. You think the modern military guys are whiny (my words) but its nothing compared to what I think about the vast majority of American civilians.

    While I was still in the Guard I cannot tell you how many times after 2001 some beer guzzling redneck slapped me on the back telling me to go kill some "ragheads". I'm sure you know far better than me after Pearl Harbor men lined up for blocks to enlist and go fight for their country.

    Even with all the patriotic crap after 9/11 from Lee Greenwood singing countless renditions of "God Bless the USA" to cheering civilians along with teary eyed new channel pundits frothing at the mouth over the World Trade Center falling to ruins there was no civilian response to 9/11 like Pearl Harbor. With a very few exceptions the civilian population stayed home, popped open a beer, and lazily watched the various wars on Fox News.

    So please forgive me if I don't share your sentiment over today's troops. They ain't squeezing the system any worse than Mr. and Mrs. John Q. Public who stayed home making plans for their precious offspring to go on some senior class trip.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No apology necessary here BB. I agree 100%. But the troops are a volunteer army and reflect the values of the general population. Having said that, I believe the core military population, those gung-ho lifers, are as good or better now than it has ever been.

      Delete
  4. I'm reluctant to touch this third rail. The fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan is so different from anything else in our history, and so unpredictable -- I couldn't possibly say whether or not our soldiers over there have PTSD or not. I'm a Vietnam veteran, but I was in the Navy. Being on a ship offshore from Vietnam was a totally different animal than being in a foxhole or any kind of fighting on land. I couldn't begin to comprehend what it's like to be at war in a country where most of the people don't want you there and every person you meet might be wearing an explosive device with your name on it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well said Tom. And I too am blessed to have never seen combat but I have been around a lot of people who have and none of them are as intent on bilking the system as is the case today. Of course, it isn't all the troop's fault. Everything today is exaggerated. The system creates epidemics where none exist. They're even trying to label obesity a disease. By doing so, fat asses who don't have enough will power to push away from the table can get expensive medical help with their "problem." I believe the number of military suicides in a good indication of just how soft we've become. As bad as Afghanistan is, it is nothing compared to what happened in the Philippines.

      Delete
  5. the united states has never treated their returning vets with any compassion, respect or the treatment they deserved.

    ReplyDelete
  6. As a veteran I wouldn't let a VA doctor touch me with a ten foot stethoscope. And you are aware that to qualify for any medical treatment at the VA you are means tested, if you made above X amount in a previous year you do not get any treatment. But I have to agree that in a nation where less than 15% of the entire population ever put on a uniform today there is something wrong when a department that serves less than 15% of the population has an 87 billion dollar budget and employes over 280,000 people.

    ReplyDelete
  7. A provocative post with excellent comments - just why I love this place! Good Morning, Mr C

    ReplyDelete
  8. My hubby was a grunt in Nam, and never even considered going to the VA for help, although, I promise you, he suffered from PTSD. One of the reasons he refused to go is the vets we saw who were complaining the most, puffing out their chests the most, and hanging around the VA the most ... had never seen combat, and wouldn't have been able to relate to my hubby's experiences at all. Their bellyaching would only have pissed him off worse than he already was. So he (and I) sucked it up and toughed it out. It took more than twenty years before he came close to being the same man he was before going to Nam. So, I say, if a single tour of hellish combat can screw with a man's head so badly, how much worse must it be for those guys who are going back to the hot spots over and over and over again? The psychological stress must be outta sight.

    ReplyDelete

Sorry about the comment thingy folks. Too much spam.