Sunday, January 31, 2010
American Sailors Deliberatly Sacrificed?
An old friend sent this to me. Like him, I remember this incident and remember the news reports stating that two Israeli fighter jets were involved.
From Wikipedia:
The USS Liberty incident was an attack on a United States Navy technical research ship, USS Liberty, by Israeli jet fighter planes, followed shortly by motor torpedo boats, on June 8, 1967, during the on-going Six-Day War. The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two Marines, and a civilian), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship. At the time, the ship was in international waters north of the Sinai Peninsula, about 25.5 nmi (29.3 mi; 47.2 km) northwest from the Egyptian city of Arish.
Both the Israeli and US governments conducted inquiries into the incident, and issued reports, which concluded that the attack was a mistake, due to Israeli confusion about the identity of the USS Liberty. Some US diplomats, veterans and intelligence officials who were involved in the incident continue to dispute these official findings, saying the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty was not a mistake, and it remains the only major maritime incident in US history not investigated by the US Congress.
My buddy knows and served with the wounded sailor who is pictured here and who helped put this report together. Not that that alone is proof of veracity, but there's always an element of more believability to something if you personally know some of the participants.
If this kind of skullduggery is true, and I personally have no doubt that to some degree it certainly is, then it becomes a lot more understandable why people around this world want to fly airplanes into our buildings.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Too Much Information
So here I go, laying bare my soul to the universe. Ten things about me you didn't know:
- I hate these things and, as I said, wouldn't be doing it except Dex was so nice about asking... well, sometimes you just can't turn down a pretty girl. But I want the world to know... THIS IS THE LAST TIME!
- I am not the Lone Ranger. But I do have a silver bullet.
- Although I may sometimes appear gruff or surly, I'm really a big softy. Just don't cross me or I'll kick your ass.
- I have met one U.S. President and shaken the hand of three others. Carter, Kennedy, Nixon, Johnson.
- I once had lunch with John Glenn, the astronaut. When asked what it was like to blast off in a rocket he replied, “What do think it feels like sitting on top of a giant fire cracker built by the lowest bidder of a government contract?”
- I once had lunch with Jessie Owens, Olympic gold medalist. Very quiet and polite. Can't remember a single thing he said.
- I once farted in a crowded elevator. Someone else got the blame.
- I have never jumped out of an airplane. And don't intend to.
- I once drove a fuel dragster. Nearly peed in my pants.
- I started the rumor that Reagan slept with Jodie Foster. Just to piss Hinkley off.
The winners are: JenJen, Heidi and Diane.
So there you have it girls. Your turn. If your ears are burning, you know someone is talking about you.
Monday, January 25, 2010
Big Ideas to Save The World
Inventor's 2020 vision: to help 1bn of the world's poorest see better.
Professor pioneers DIY adjustable glasses that do not need an optician.
A Zulu man wearing adaptive glasses. (photo by Michael Lewis)
It was a chance conversation on March 23 1985 ("in the afternoon, as I recall") that first started Josh Silver on his quest to make the world's poor see. A professor of physics at Oxford University, Silver was idly discussing optical lenses with a colleague, wondering whether they might be adjusted without the need for expensive specialist equipment, when the lightbulb of inspiration first flickered above his head.
What if it were possible, he thought, to make a pair of glasses which, instead of requiring an optician, could be "tuned" by the wearer to correct his or her own vision? Might it be possible to bring affordable spectacles to millions who would never otherwise have them?
More than two decades after posing that question, Silver now feels he has the answer. The British inventor has embarked on a quest that is breathtakingly ambitious, but which he insists is achievable - to offer glasses to a billion of the world's poorest people by 2020.
If the scale of his ambition is dazzling, at the heart of his plan is an invention which is engagingly simple.
Silver has devised a pair of glasses which rely on the principle that the fatter a lens the more powerful it becomes. Inside the device's tough plastic lenses are two clear circular sacs filled with fluid, each of which is connected to a small syringe attached to either arm of the spectacles.
The wearer adjusts a dial on the syringe to add or reduce amount of fluid in the membrane, thus changing the power of the lens. When the wearer is happy with the strength of each lens the membrane is sealed by twisting a small screw, and the syringes removed. The principle is so simple, the team has discovered, that with very little guidance people are perfectly capable of creating glasses to their own prescription.
Silver calls his flash of insight a "tremendous glimpse of the obvious" - namely that opticians weren't necessary to provide glasses.
The implications of bringing glasses within the reach of poor communities are enormous, says the scientist. Literacy rates improve hugely, fishermen are able to mend their nets, women to weave clothing. During an early field trial, funded by the British government, in Ghana, Silver met a man called Henry Adjei-Mensah, whose sight had deteriorated with age, as all human sight does, and who had been forced to retire as a tailor because he could no longer see to thread the needle of his sewing machine. "So he retires. He was about 35. He could have worked for at least another 20 years. We put these specs on him, and he smiled, and threaded his needle, and sped up with this sewing machine. He can work now. He can see."
Thursday, January 21, 2010
An Absolute "Must See"
From the email:
These incredible images of waves in the Hawaiian Islands were taken by Clark Little, the number one photographer of surf.Waimea Bay, shore-break surfing pioneer, husband, and father of two, Clark Little has gained nationwide recognition for his photography.
It all started in 2007 when Clark's wife wanted a nice piece of art to decorate a wall. Voluntarily, Clark grabbed a camera, jumped in the water, and starting snapping away capturing the beauty and power of monstrous Hawaiian waves from the inside out.
" Clark's view" is a unique view of the ocean that most will only be able to experience safely on land while studying one of Clark's photos. Now with a camera upgrade and an itch to get that better shot, Clark has taken this on full time and has moved his office from land, to the inside of a barrel.
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Are You Safe? Is Anyone Safe?
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
The Best Birthday Party Ever
Monday, January 11, 2010
Eyeball Tattoos? You Can't Make This Shit Up
When asked why he would do this to himself, David Boltjes (whose eyes are red) poetically remarked, "You can't ask why...the real question is why not," and his fellow inmate, blue-eyed Paul Inman explained that now, no one in the world would have the same color peepers as he has. Neither man would say how they managed to color their eyeballs, but both concurred it was extremely painful.
WTF will these assholes think of next? And if that isn't enough, check this out. Scientists are researching biodegradable, silicon-silk devices that could be implanted inside the human body for various applications, potentially including the development of "LED tattoo" skin displays.Unlike the current breed of "rigid" implantable chips (such as the ID tags that can be put into pets), these devices would build a silicon circuits into thin films of silk that would be flexible and could conform to the surface of human tissue.
Wired explains that the implants would eventually melt away in the body: The silk substrate onto which the chips are mounted eventually dissolve away inside the body, leaving just the electronics behind. The silicon chips are around the length of a small grain of rice -- about one millimeter, and just 250 nanometers thick, and the sheet of silk will keep them in place, moulding to the shape of the skin when saline is added. So what might be the applications for this technology? According to Wired, "these tattoos could carry LEDs, turning the wearer's skin into a screen." H+ magazine imagines you could show off your latest Flash animations, watch TV on your arm, or have a built-in PDA screen. MIT's Technology Review also notes, "The group is developing silk-silicon LEDs that might act as photonic tattoos that can show blood-sugar readings, as well as arrays of conformable electrodes that might interface with the nervous system." Electronics-maker Philips has conceived of more sensual, personal uses for the devices: Stimulated by touch, an Electronic Tattoo traverses across the landscape of the body, navigated by desire.
Sunday, January 10, 2010
It's Time To Fight Back
Thursday, January 7, 2010
The Future Is Now
Monday, January 4, 2010
You Can't Make This Shit Up

The theme of the event, according to Stephen Langa, its Ugandan organizer, was “the gay agenda — that whole hidden and dark agenda” — and the threat homosexuals posed to Bible-based values and the traditional African family.
For three days, according to participants and audio recordings, thousands of Ugandans, including police officers, teachers and national politicians, listened raptly to the Americans, who were presented as experts on homosexuality. The visitors discussed how to make gay people straight, how gay men often sodomized teenage boys and how “the gay movement is an evil institution” whose goal is “to defeat the marriage-based society and replace it with a culture of sexual promiscuity.”
Now the three Americans are finding themselves on the defensive, saying they had no intention of helping stoke the kind of anger that could lead to what came next: a bill to impose a death sentence for homosexual behavior.
Isn't it strange that the countries and cultures of this world who condone the use of rape and sodomy as a punishment and weapon of war are the ones who have the most savage laws against homosexuality and the highest rates of HIV?
Don't think it can't happen here. The division of the Episcopal Church over a gay bishop is proof enough of how backward thinking a lot of people in this country are.
Gay rights is a civil rights issue and we must never give up the fight.











